Truly, Time To Transform Thy Teaching To Thinking!
I am a certified Civil Service Professional teacher. Teachers anywhere in the world, public or private, we have been educated wrong & wrongly!
In the
Philippines, the wrong teaching happens, from the most expensive private school
International School Manila (ISM), $16,160
per year[1] (Moneymax), to the inexpensive University
of the Philippines System (UP System) where mega-blogger Frank A Hilario
graduated (UP Los Baños). Teachers teach us to memorize, and then memorize, and
finally memorize!
Our teachers do not teach us to think, and how
to think!
German American Gundula Bosch says we must “Train PhD Students To Be Thinkers Not Just Specialists[2]” (14 February 2018, Nature.com):
(Today, microbiology) students are taught every
detail of a microbe’s life cycle but little about the life scientific. They
need to be taught to recognize how errors can occur. Trainees should evaluate
case studies derived from flawed real research, or use interdisciplinary
detective games to find logical fallacies in the literature. Above all,
students must be shown the scientific process as it is – with its limitations
and potential pitfalls as well as its fun side, such as serendipitous
discoveries and hilarious blunders.
Learning should both be fun and mentally rewarding.
Miss Bosch is referring both to critical
thinking (“scientific process”) and creative
thinking (as in “serendipitous discoveries”). Science should be both mechanical and mental.
Since early
2015, Miss Bosch and Arturo Casadevall have
been “(impressing) the need to put the philosophy back into the doctorate of
philosophy; that is, pushing the ‘Ph’ back into the ‘PhD.’” She says:
We call our program R3, which means that our students learn to
apply Rigor to their design and conduct of experiments; view their work through
the lens of social Responsibility; and to think critically, communicate better,
and thus improve Reproducibility.
You have to
Think Out Science:
Our offerings are different from others at the
graduate level. We have critical-thinking assignments in which students analyze
errors in reasoning in a New York Times
opinion piece about "Big Sugar", and the ethical implications of the arguments
made in a New Yorker piece by
surgeon Atul Gawande entitled "The
Mistrust of Science."
In R3 Science,
you learn how to think of theory – also how to think of methods and results.
Critical thinking plus creative
thinking. Revolutionary!
Miss Bosch
is not finished. She says:
So far, we have built 5 new courses from
scratch and have enrolled 85 students from nearly a dozen departments and
divisions. The courses cover the anatomy of errors and misconduct in scientific
practice and teach students how to dissect the scientific literature. An
interdisciplinary discussion series encourages broad and critical thinking
about science. Our students learn to consider societal consequences of research
advances, such as the ability to genetically alter sperm and eggs.
In the Philippines’
ISM, high school students can learn robotics and food technology – it’s all
mechanical thinking, memory work or students simply reciting what they have been
instructed to memorize. None of it mental calisthenics.
No, not thinkingly, our teachers are teaching us
only to think like them!@517
[1]https://ph.news.yahoo.com/schools-highest-tuition-metro-manila-020058943.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=fb&tsrc=fb&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9sLmZhY2Vib29rLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAFlqoJ30NFSXe_vSm1deUDFeRz9KRoY4OhjtwyA8bAMkDrT_JAhzeasO0DU1u2zWxwHy7FWvFR95TLz9ilekRvs-2PEZN_OCcAl8i_tqPYhwdfKSMTK2JUBVRosC3DmuzvhIaGPxxxNjhrZTVoyKbijf-T1QFTKjTC-aScA7G_Kx
[2]https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-01853-1
Comments
Post a Comment